Prabat Plaza Private Limited and 4 Ors. v. Religare Finvest Limited and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Judgment text is unintelligible OCR noise with no substantive content or reasoning available. Unable to extract a summary.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
fcv :
v<'
. 2. ..
| 13-11-20 23 Date L-A «' |
/ . I Due to administrative reason, board discharged.o^--oI_-2oZi^_ Office Notes; Appearances **and Registrar's order ****_I _Chairperson's Orders** |
w »u. 1 ■ ■ 4 |
|---|
?:•
| ■ . f 7» |
|---|
| ■ 4 '</;4 ■ '?■< |
| _■J _7 ! I |
| c |
| Y |
| 5 |
I
7?
' '-7 ' ■•
fiEBTSREcgyERY APPELLATE
TRIBUNAL, MU MBAS ~
Miao Application No. - of 20
In ^kNorl
.‘Appeal No. of 202.3 J>//V
. U’
... Appollants
(Advocate €( '^^f) t
J
Versus
<45.-fiali •
Qfe^ pMX/Qz’Ar /-TP Respondonto
(AcJvocnt0_____
J
Data
Office Notes, Appearances
and Registrar's order / Chalrperson'e Orders
^^-23
Appeal presented .. by. H4. Vt^44 Po4H -<2l -te&a-
Advocate for Appellant with LXD.^^fe of Rs.
on
being aggrieved by the Impugned order order
Passed on J_klS3_2^3 _in S.A. of?^33
by ORT./IaaAcu tu/s IQ of R.D.D.B.& F I Anl inoa / 18 of
S.A.R.F.A.e'.S.I. Act. 2002,
Exh - I Appeal Memo
S.O. for compliance (0 /M/Q^3 .
. L
O/one ftr boVh Pa^s. R Gt^RAR
QemovaJ At? \3/n / i-bts,
* ■ ■ t' y
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · November
- CNR
- 271090013292023
- Bench
- Nishad Fazil F
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court