The Authorized Officer, Bombay Mercantile Co-operative Bank Limited, v. Bapu Wamanrao Wahul

/

J.:

• 4 .
  I '
  /
  ••
  r-'(
  • V
  -■vA--
  V <
  II
  •:*. •
  X
  ■■■■^. . i;i )
  6.I0PJO s. LIO bJ edJIBbid / JGPJO? 8(‘jej)siB0H pue
  (HBa '
  X v. , 090UH-<^^Y^H;
  

■J

■'7^

^trbunal, mumbab
Mlec Application No. . oF9n .
—
. in -or20 -«kNor_______ _
.“Appeal1 No« JH ^3 of 20 JV'V
■. ...xv/)/.
' ... Appollantg
(Advocate,
AmSSI J
Versus
Rospondfinta
(Advocate
J
movkiuavwt®nv*>«
Dfito Office Notes, Appearances
and Registrar's order/Chfllrperoon'o Orders
JerTp-^ =-- - ■ -
' Appeal presented .. by "T AA T>A _______ ,
Advocate for Appellant with of RB, ^ZSo^-Vp on
being aggrieved by (lie Impugned order / final order
PaGSGd on in sSup^, No. 13^ of Q-ts^
, by DRT' 20 of R7B:D:D.& p I Aol 1993/./ 18 of
S.A.R.F.A.E's.I. Act. 2002.
Exh - -I Appeal Memo
1 |/>d22-3
S.O. for compliance Io
REGI :AR
15-11-2023
Due to administrative reason,
board discharged, oZf.-o|- 2024.
.... sfe"

P.T.O.