Uco Bank v. 1. Mr. P.V Sitarama Naidu 2. Mr. Tripuraneni Mahidhar Chowdhury
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL: KOLKATA CAMP COURT AT DRT, VISAKHAPATNAM
Appeal No. 55 of 2022
(Arising out of SA.145/2019 In DRT, Visakhapatnam)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
16.08.2023
UCO Bank
..........Appellant
-Vrs-
Mr. P.V. Sitarama Naidu & Anr..........Respondents
Mr. Santosh Kumar Ray, Learned counsel for the Appellant Mr. R. Padmanabha Raju, Learned counsel for the Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL:
Heard the Ld. Counsel for the appellant. Adjournment is sought by the Respondent No.2. None is present for the Respondent bank.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
UCO Bank
- respondent
Mr. P.V. Sitarama Naidu
- respondent
Mr. P.V. Sitarama Naidu
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court