Single judge disposed of an appeal listing date for a reply and closed respondent no. 1's time to file without substantive adjudication.
None
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 503/2013 Date: 18.04.2023
M/s Bansal Stores and Anr. Vs. State Bank of India and Anr.
Present: Shri M. K. Srivastava, counsel for the appellants, Shri Sandeep Arora, counsel for the respondents-Bank, None for the respondent no. 2,
The office report dated 17.04.2023 shows that no reply has been filed on behalf of the respondent no. 1. Therefore, the right of the respondent no. 1 to file reply is hereby closed as the appeal is of year 2013.
The said report further shows that the proof of publication has been filed with regard to the service upon the respondent no. 2, but none has put in appearance on his behalf. Let the respondent no. 2 put in appearance and file reply by the next date, failing which appropriate order shall be passed.
List this case on 06.07.2023 for reply.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
M/s Bansal Stores and Anr.
State Bank of India and Anr.
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
