Ms Gayatri Milk Dairy Pvt. Ltd. v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The bank sought to withdraw opposition due to a pending appeal. Respondent no.3 was granted four weeks to file opposition, allowing the appellant to file a rejoinder subsequently. The order listed the appeal for further hearing.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appl No. 50 of 2023
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON
18.04.2023
M/s. Gayatri Milk Diary Pvt. Ltd.
… Appellant Vs.
The AO, Canara Bank & Ors.
….. Respondents
For Appellant : Mr. N. Srinivas, ld. Counsel.
For Respondent: Ms. Aparajita Ghosh, ld. Counsel for bank Mr. Souvik Ghosh, ld. Counsel. Mr. D.N.Murty, ld. Counsel for respondent no.3 Mr. N. Narasimha, ld. Counsel.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned counsel for the respondent bank submits that since they have already filed appeal against the same impugned order in appeal No. 49 of 2023, they are not willing to file opposition to this appeal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s. Gayatri Milk Diary Pvt. Ltd.
- respondent
The AO, Canara Bank
- respondent
Respondent no.3
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
13 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court