The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal as not pressed by the appellant, who did not wish to maintain the matter. No substantive issues were considered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA Appl No. 25 of 2022
(Arising out of SA No. 368 of 2019 DRT-3 Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON
18.04.2023
Sri Kamal Karmakar
… Appellant
Vs.
AO, UCO Bank & Anr.
….. Respondents
For Appellant : Ms. Kakali Das Chakraborty, ld. Counsel.
For Respondent: Mr. Santosh Kr. Ray, ld. Counsel Ms. Rituparna Sanyal, ld. Counsel Ms. Sumana Mukherjee, ld. Counsel
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned counsel for the appellant does not want to press this appeal. Learned counsel has made endorsement to that effect on the memo of the appeal.
Accordingly, appeal is dismissed as not pressed. No order as to costs.
File be consigned to record room.
Copy of the order be supplied to the appellant and the respondents and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
Copy of the judgement/Final Order be uploaded in the Tribunal’s website.
Order dictated, signed and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 18th day of April, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava, J) Chairperson
Dated : 18.04.2023 01/pkb
Kamal Karmakar
AO, UCO Bank & Anr.
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
