The appeal was disposed of because a settlement had been arrived at between the appellant and the auction purchaser, with the auction purchaser not contesting the appeal, leading to the withdrawal of the appeal per affidavits filed.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. The file was consigned to the record room and copies supplied to parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appl. No. 50 of 2023
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON
16.10.2023
M/s. Gayatri Milk Diary Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant Vs.
AO, Canara Bank & Ors.
….. Respondents
For Appellant : Mr. Nemani Srinivas, ld. Advocate.
For Respondents : Ms. Aparajita Ghosh, ld. Advocate. Mr. Souvik Ghosh, ld. Advocate.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Affidavit filed by the appellant and respondent no.3 are taken on record wherein it is stated that settlement has arrived at between the appellant as well as auction purchaser. Respondent no.3 does not want to contest the appeal. Accordingly, appeal is disposed of in terms of the affidavit filed by the appellant as well as respondent no.3.
In view of the above, instant appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
File be consigned to record room.
Copy of the order be supplied to the appellant and the respondents and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT. Copy of the judgement/Final Order be uploaded in the Tribunal’s website.
Order dictated, signed and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 16 day of October, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava, J) Chairperson
Dated : 16.10.2023 04 /pkb
M/s. Gayatri Milk Diary Pvt. Ltd.
AO, Canara Bank
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
