A disposal order regarding an old appeal. The bench directed respondents to file an opposition. If not filed by the stipulated date, the court may not record it, and set the matter for further hearing.
The opposition must be filed within a week positively by 7th July, 2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 47 of 2017
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
| 30.06.2023 | B. Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy … Appellant -Vs- Reliance Asset Reconstruction Company Limited & Others … Respondents |
|---|---|
| Mr. Nemani Srinivas, Learned Counsel for Appellant |
|
| Ms. Mekhala Kanji, Learned Counsel for Respondent |
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Power is filed on behalf of Reliance Asset Reconstruction Co. Ltd. Record shows that reliance Asset Reconstruction Company was impleaded as Respondent on 27th July, 2018 when the State Bank of India informed that the loan has been assigned to the Reliance Asset Reconstruction Company. For about five years Respondent Reliance Asset Reconstruction Company could not file the opposition. Now today again time is being sought for filing opposition. This is an old Appeal of 2017. Learned Counsel submits that she has filed the vakalatnama on 28th June, 2023 only. Let the opposition be filed within a week positively by 7th July, 2023. If the opposition is not filed by 7th July, 2023, it shall not be taken on record. Copy be
2
served upon the Appellant who may file the rejoinder within a week thereafter.
List on 10th August, 2023 for hearing of appeal.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 30th June, 2023 11/tp
B. Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy
Reliance Asset Reconstruction Company Limited & Others
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
