Single Judge Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed prayer for stay of operation of judgment before the Appellate Tribunal. No substantive decision is recorded in this order apart from declining the stay request.
Prayer for stay of operation of the judgment is declined.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 41 of 2020
(Arising out of M.A. 1162 of 2017 in Diary No. 745 of 2017 in DRT, Cuttack)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
05.09.2023 Nawal Kumar Agarwal … Appellant -VsState Bank of India & 5 Others … Respondents Mr. Nemani Srinivas, Learned Counsel for the Appellant Mr. Debasish Chakrabarti with Ms. Sharmistha Pal, Counsel for Respondent No. 1
Mr. Nimish Mishra with Mr. Gaurav Singh, Counsel for Respondent No. 2
Mr. Subrata Kumar Sinha, Counsel for Respondent No. 3
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Later:
Counsel for Respondent No. 2 prays for stay of operation of the judgment for four weeks. I do not find any ground to stay the operation of the judgment. Accordingly, prayer for stay is declined.
This order be treated as part of the judgment and order dated 5th September, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated 05th September, 2023 02/ac
Nawal Kumar Agarwal
State Bank of India
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
