Shyam Sundar palreddy v. Union Bank of India
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Dy. No. 115/2023 Date: 21/02/2023
Shyam Sundar Palreddy ------------Appellant
Versus
Union Bank of India & 2 Ors.. ------------Respondents
Received an application on 13/02/2023 filed online as well as hard copy on same date under Section 18 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 presented by Ld. Advocate, Mr. Nemani Srinivas.
Ld. Advocate, Mr. Nemani Srinivas states that at the time of online filing due to inadvertent mistake name of appellant has been mentioned as “M/s. Aditya Construction represented by M Ramesh Reddy” instead of “Shyam Sundar Palreddy”. This technical defect is cleared on 21/02/2023.
Scrutiny of the application reveals the followings:
The application has been filed on behalf of Shyam Sundar Palreddy against the order dated 30/01/2023 passed in S.A. No. 185 of 2019 in DRT-II, Hyderabad. Application fees of Rs.50005/- vide Transaction Ref. ID 1302230015790 dt. 13.02.2023 has been paid through online along with the application.
The Vakalatnama has been filed by the Ld. Advocate.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Shyam Sundar Palreddy
- respondent
Union Bank of India
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court