State Bank Of India v. Singirikonda Anjaiah
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal noted that the respondents were served via email but did not appear for the hearing. The matter was listed for hearing on 24th January, 2024. [null]
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary No. 187 of 2020
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
27.09.2023 State Bank of India … Appellant -VsSingarikonda Anjaiah & 5 Others … Respondents Ms. Mekhala Kanji, Learned Counsel for Appellant None for Respondents
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
An e-mail is received on behalf of the Respondents which makes it clear that Respondents are served but none is present to represent them.
List on 24th January, 2024 for hearing of appeal.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated 27th September, 2023
09/ac
Parties & counsel
- appellant
State Bank of India
- respondent
Singarikonda Anjaiah and 5 Others
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court