State Bank Of India v. Singirikonda Anjaiah
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Kolkata, on 12.09.2022, held that service via the affidavit filed by the appellant was ineffective. The court directed the appellant to serve a fresh notice through paper publication and listed the matter for hearing on 05.01.2023.
What did the court decide?
Direction to appellant to serve fresh notice by paper publication.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal Dy. No. 187 of 2020)
(IA No. 110 of 2020)
(IA No. 111 of 2020)
(IA No. 112 of 2020)
(Arising out of S.A. 208 of 2017 in DRT-1, Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
12.09.2022
State Bank of India
… Appellant
-Vs-
Singirikonda Anjaiah
… Respondents Ms. Mekhla Kanji, learned counsel for the appellants. None for the respondent.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether service of summons upon the respondent was effected and, if not, whether a fresh method of service is required.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
State Bank of India
- respondent
Singirikonda Anjaiah
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court