This order granted an application to summon the record from the DRT, Lucknow. The recorded reasons for the order are limited to the necessity for adjudication as stated by the appellant's counsel.
Application I.A. No. 672/2022 allowed; record to be summoned from DRT, Lucknow prior to the next hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 308/2020 Date: 25.05.2023
Bigway Infotech LLP Vs. Union Bank of India & Anr.
Present: Shri V. K. Shukla, counsel for the appellant, Miss Ashwini Pal, Advocate holding brief of Shri Sandeep Arora, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
Learned counsel for the appellant has moved an application being I.A. no. 672/2022 for summoning the record from the DRT, Lucknow in S.A. No. 683/2019 and states that it is necessary for adjudication of the matter.
Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank has no objection.
In view of the aforesaid, the application being I.A. no. 672/2022 is allowed and the registry is directed to summon the record with regard to this case from the DRT concerned prior to the date fixed in the case.
List this case on 19.09.2023.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
1 issue framed by the court
Whether summoning record from the District Recovery Tribunal was necessary for adjudication.
Bigway Infotech LLP
Union Bank of India
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
