This appeal mentions counsel's unavailability for the respondent-Bank and grants an adjournment for the hearing to a future date.
Adjournment granted to 13.12.2023 for hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 30/2023 Date: 19.09.2023
Bigway Infotech LLP Vs. Union Bank of India & Anr.
Present: Shri V. K. Shukla, counsel for the appellant, Shri Pawan Mishra, Advocate holding brief of Shri Sandeep Arora, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
A mention has been made on behalf of the learned counsel for the respondent-Bank that the arguing counsel Shri Sandeep Arora is busy before the Hon’ble High Court, therefore, he is unable to appear before this Tribunal today, hence he prays for adjournment on his behalf.
As prayed, list this case on 13.12.2023 for hearing.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Bigway Infotech LLP
Union Bank of India & Anr.
Justice R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
