Renu Chaudhary v. Syndicate Bank and 3 Ors.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
M.A. No. 64/2021 In Regular Appeal No. 288/2018 Date: 13.07.2023
Renu Chaudhary Vs. Syndicate Bank & Ors.
Present: Shri M. K. Srivastava, counsel for the appellant, Shri Ramesh Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Shri Maneesh Mehrotra, counsel for the respondent nos. 1 & 2-Bank, Shri Varun Kumar Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Shri Kundan Rai, counsel for the respondent no. 4-ICICI Bank,
Learned counsels for the respondents seek time to file reply. Let the same be filed by the next date.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he may be permitted to take steps within a week for service of notice upon the respondent no. 3 by publication in the newspaper having wide circulation in the area.
Ordered accordingly. Affidavit of service along with proof of publication be filed by the next date.
List this case on 12.10.2023 for service.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Renu Chaudhary
- respondent
Syndicate Bank & Ors.
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court