Renu Chaudhary v. Syndicate Bank and 3 Ors.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
M.A. No. 64/2021 In Regular Appeal No. 288/2018 Date: 22.02.2023
Renu Chaudhary Vs. Syndicate Bank & Ors.
Present: Shri M. K. Srivastava, counsel for the appellant, Shri Maneesh Mehrotra, counsel for the respondent no. 1- Bank,
Shri Varun Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Shri Kundan Rai, counsel for the respondent no. 4-ICICI Bank,
The office report dated 21.02.2023 shows that no reply has been filed by the respondent-Bank nor any affidavit of service has been filed to authenticate the service upon the other respondents. Let the same be filed by the next date.
Copy of the restoration application has been served upon the counsel for the respondent no. 1-Bank, who seeks time to file reply. Let the same be filed by the next date.
List this case on 31.03.2023 for service.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Renu Chaudhary
- respondent
Syndicate Bank
- respondent
ICICI Bank
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court