Punjab National Bank v. Arbab Siddiqui
Case brief
What is this about?
The Bank appealed an interim order restraining it from taking possession of secured assets. The court disposed of the appeal by directing the DRT to decide the pending appeal within three months.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the Presiding Officer, DRT, Allahabad to decide the pending S.A. No. 137/2023 within three months.
What the court decided
Appeal Dy. No. 805/2023 Date: 13.07.2023
Punjab National Bank Vs. Arbab Siddiqui
Present: Shri S. K. Pandey, counsel for the appellant,
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.
The present appeal has been filed under section 18 of the SARFAESI Act against the interim order dated 25.04.2023 passed by the DRT, Allahabad in S.A. No. 137/2023, whereby the Bank has been restrained from taking physical possession of the secured asset. It has been contended that the amount as mentioned in the demand notice and the amount claimed before the A.D.M. are the same, but the Bank has admitted that outstanding amount before the Tribunal is Rs. 33,26,037/- plus expenses etc. The S.A. is still pending consideration before the Tribunal below.
Be that as it may, the present appeal is finally disposed off with direction upon the Presiding Officer, DRT, Allahabad to consider and decide the S.A. No. 137/2023 in accordance with law most expeditiously, preferably within three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. It is made clear that the parties shall not seek adjournment unnecessarily.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the internal appeal filed by the Bank against the interim stay order should be disposed of expeditiously by the DRT.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Punjab National Bank
- respondent
Arbab Siddiqui
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · LD Registrar
- Order 2 — this page · Rajesh Dayal Khare
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court