Ms Norton Industries v. Punjab National Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judges order adjourning an appeal due to a change in counsel, with no substantive decision rendered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 264/2013
Between
M/s Norton Industries … Appellant/s
V/s.
The Authorized Officer of Punjab National Bank …Respondent/s Mr Prashant Pandit along with Mr Jay Pandit, Advocate for Appellant.
Ms Asha Bhuta & Mr Anshul Bhuta, i/b M/s. Bhuta & Associates, Advocate for Respondent No. 1.
Mr Gurang Kinkhabwala i/b Ms Sonali Jain, Advocate for Respondent No. 2.
There is a change in vakalatnama for the first Respondent Bank. The Counsel now appearing for the Respondent seeks time for a hearing.
Post the matter for hearing on 16.06.2023.
Chairperson
mks-21
1
M/s Norton Industries
The Authorized Officer of Punjab National Bank
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court