Goldie Sud v. Punjab National Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a preliminary order regarding a change in legal representation and a request for time to file a reply in Misc. Appeal No. 99/2011. No substantive legal proposition is established.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL/AT:^MUMBAT
Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menons Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No. 204/2010
Between
Goldie Sud
■ • V^Dpellant/s
Advocate fo
And
Oy^Mi^^^ppeal No, 99/2011
Be^eMV^
... Appellant/s
... .Respondent/s
V/s. Punjab National Bank Appellant present in person. Mr. Fenil Sangoi, M/s. Intralegal, Advocate fo
Goldie Sud
V/s. Punjab National Bank^^^V ... .Respondent/s Appellant presenHn persoh. Mr. Fenil Sangop^/s^^k ^gal, Advocate for Respondent \ ©rder dated: 16/01/2023:- \GQuhsel appearing for the first Respondent Bank SUDHUtj^haT' Sere is a change in vakalatnama and seeks time for the hearingX^^ Reply, if any, shall be filed within two weeks with an advance copy to the other side.
rm-20-21
Post on 09.03.2023 for reply/hearing positively.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Goldie Sud
- respondent
Punjab National Bank
Coram
Ashok Menons
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court