Smt Malti Singh Chauhan v. State Bank of India and 3 Ors.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 244/2020 Date: 11.05.2023
Present: Shri A. K. Sharma, counsel for the appellant, Shri Sandeep Arora, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
Learned counsel for the appellant contends that the affidavit of service will be filed during course of the day and all the respondents have duly been noticed.
Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank submits that he has not been served with the copy of appeal. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he shall serve the same upon the counsel for the respondent-Bank during course of the day, who may file reply by the next date fixed.
The served respondents may also put in appearance and file reply by the next date.
List this case on 24.08.2023 for reply.
Anupam
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Appellant
- respondent
Respondent-Bank
Coram
Anupam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court