Madan Pal Sharma v. Syndicate Bank
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
M.A. No. 31/2021 in M.A. No. 156/2019 Date: 21.03.2023
Madan Pal Sharma and Anr. Vs. Syndicate Bank and Ors.
Present: Shri Prabhav Srivastava, Advocate holding brief of Shri Abhay Kumar Singh, counsel for the appellant, None for the respondent-Bank,
Shri Kushal Kant, counsel for the respondents No. 2 and 3,
The office report dated 20.03.2023 shows that no reply has been filed by the respondent nos. 1, 2 & 3 to the restoration application.
Learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 & 3 seeks time to file reply. Let the same be filed by the next date, failing which appropriate order shall be passed.
List this case along with Regular Appeal No. 10/2014 on 03.05.2023.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Madan Pal Sharma
- appellant
Anr.
- respondent
Syndicate Bank
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court