Madan Pal Sharma v. Syndicate Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Listing order directing respondents to file reply to restoration application within specified time.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
M.A. No. 31/2021 and M.A. No. 156/2019 In Regular Appeal No. 25/2014
Date: 28.09.2022
Madan Pal Sharma and Anr. Vs. Syndicate Bank and Ors.
Present: Shri Abhay Kumar Singh, counsel for the appellant, Shri B.K. Kesharwani, counsel for the respondent-Bank, Shri Kushal Kant, counsel for the respondents No.2 and 3,
The office report dated 27.09.2022 shows that no reply has been filed on behalf of all the respondents to the restoration application. Let the same be filed by the next date, failing which appropriate order shall be passed.
List this case along with Regular Appeal No. 10/2014 on 07.11.2022.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Madan Pal Sharma
- respondent
Syndicate Bank
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court