This is a hearing order in Regular Appeal No. 22/2020 where the respondent bank's counsel was adjourned due to unavailability. The matter was listed for hearing on 20.12.2023.
Interim order, if any, shall continue till next hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 22/2020 Date: 29.11.2023
M/s Om Traders & Anr. Vs. Bank of Baroda & Ors.
Present: Shri S. K. Gupta, counsel for the appellants, Shri Avinash Jaiswal, counsel for the respondent-Bank, Shri Bharat Kant, Advocate holding brief of Shri Kushal Kant, counsel for the respondent no. 3,
A mention has been made on behalf of the learned counsel for the respondent no. 3 that the arguing counsel Shri Kushal Kant is indisposed today, therefore, he is unable to appear before this Tribunal, hence he seeks adjournment.
As the learned counsel Shri Kushal Kant is unable to appear today, but an undertaking has been given that he shall argue the case on the next date.
List this case for hearing on 20.12.2023. Till then the interim order, if any, shall continue.
Anupam
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
M/s Om Traders & Anr.
Bank of Baroda & Ors.
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
17 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
