In a regular appeal, the Supreme Court directed the respondents to file their reply within the next court listing, noting a significant delay since the appeal was filed in 2018.
Respondents directed to file their reply by the next date of listing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 219/2018 Date: 01.02.2023
M/s Dolce Foods Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Punjab National Bank & Anr.
Present: Shri Ramesh Singh, Advocate holding brief of Shri V. K. Singh, counsel for the appellants, Shri A. K. Pal, counsel for the respondent-Bank, Shri V. K. Shukla, counsel for the respondent no. 2-Auction Purchaser,
The office report dated 31.01.2023 shows that no reply has been filed by the respondents inspite of two opportunities. The appeal is of year 2018. Let the respondents file reply by the next date, failing which their right to file reply shall stand closed.
List this case on 26.04.2023 for reply.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to allow a delay of five years (2018 to 2023) in filing a reply to a regular appeal.
Whether to grant time for respondents to file their reply to a notice served under Section 151 CPC.
M/s Dolce Foods Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Punjab National Bank
Auction Purchaser
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
