The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal noted the absence of counsel for the appellant bank and issued a notice to the General Managers of the banks involved to file an affidavit clarifying their representation status and intention to proceed with the appeal. The matter was listed for further orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 207 of 2018
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
01.09.2023 State Bank of India & 3 Others … Appellants -VsLimtex (India) Limited & 8 Others ... Respondents
Mr. Debasish Chakrabarti with Ms. Sharmistha Pal, Learned Counsel for the Appellants
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
It is submitted on behalf of the Appellant Bank that Learned Counsel, Mr. Debasish Chakrabarti, has already given ‘No Objection’ to the Bank for engaging some other Counsel but no Counsel is present to represent the Appellants.
Registry is directed to issue notice to the General Manager, State Bank of India, Stressed Assets Management Branch, Nagaland House, 8th Floor, 11 and 13, Shakespeare Sarani, Kolkata – 700 071 and General Manager UCO Bank, Flagship Corporate Branch, 2, India Exchange Place, Kolkata – 700 001 to file affidavit stating as to why no Counsel is engaged by them. They should also respond as to whether they intend to press the appeal or not.
List on 12th December, 2023 for further orders.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated 01st September, 2023
03/ac
State Bank of India
Limtex (India) Limited
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
