Punjab National Bank v. Bolin Chetia
Case brief
What is this about?
Empty single-paragraph order dismissing appearance for lack of instruction and fixing next hearing date.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 06 of 2016
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
03.07.2023 Punjab National Bank ... Appellant -VsBolin Chetia ... Respondent Ms. Aparajita Rao with Ms. Ankana Basu, Learned Counsel for the Appellant
Mr. Prasenjit Pal, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 1
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Mr. Prasenjit Pal, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 1, submits that he has no instruction in the matter.
In such circumstances, fresh notice be issued to Respondent No. 1 to the effect that he may engage some other Counsel, if he so desires.
Affidavit-of-Service be filed within two weeks.
List on 5th September, 2023 for hearing of the appeal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Punjab National Bank
- respondent
Bolin Chetia
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court