Uco Bank v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The Tribunal held that the appeal was not being pressed by the appellant as the matter was settled between parties, and accordingly dismissed the appeal.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed; pending I.A.s disposed of; interim order vacated.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Misc. Application Diary No. 157 of 2023 (Arising out of SA No. 06 of 2012 in DRT Cuttack)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
03.07.2023 UCO Bank & Anr ... Appellant -VsState Bank of India & ors ... Respondent Ms. Sonal Agarwal, Learned Counsel for the Appellant None for Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that the matter is settled between the parties. Learned Counsel endorses on the memo of Appeal that the Appellant is not pressing the appeal. Accordingly, Appeal is dismissed.
Pending I.A.s if any, are disposed of accordingly. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Copy of the order be supplied to the Appellant and the Respondent and the copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
File be consigned to Record Room.
Order dictated, signed, dated and pronounced in open Court today.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
UCO Bank & Anr
- respondent
State Bank of India & ors
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · July
- CNR
- 191090001572023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court