The appellant withdrew the appeal arising from a DRT order. The Appeal Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. The order cited originally passed was incorporated into this disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 170 of 2013
(Arising out of O.A. No. 508 of 2002 in DRT, Visakhapatnam)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
23.11.2023 Saroja Raja Raman and others ... Appellants -VsAndhra Bank & others ……Respondents Mr. Nemani Srinivas, Learned Counsel for the Appellant Mr. S. Pal Chowdhury, Learned Counsel Ms. Saswati Sikder, Learned Counsel for the Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that the Appellants do not want to press the Appeal and are withdrawing the Appeal. He has also drawn the attention towards the order dated 05.07.2016. Since the Appeal is withdrawn, accordingly, Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Order dated 05.07.2016 passed in this appeal shall be part of this order.
Pending I.A.s if any, are disposed of accordingly. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Copy of the order be supplied to the Appellant and the Respondent and the copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
2
File be consigned to Record Room.
Order dictated, signed, dated and pronounced in open Court today.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 23rd November, 2023 20/tp
Saroja Raja Raman and others
Andhra Bank and others
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
