Single judge order setting a case for later date to allow the respondent-Bank to file a reply to waiver/delay condonation applications, warning that the right to file shall stand closed if not done by the next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 149/2017 Date: 21.04.2023
Present: Shri Prabhav Srivastava, counsel for the appellants, Shri Kushal Kant, counsel for the respondent-Bank, Ex-parte against the respondent no. 3,
Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the arguing counsel Shri Rituraj Srivastava is indisposed, therefore, he is unable to appear today, hence prays for adjournment.
The office report dated 20.04.2023 shows that no reply has been filed on behalf of the respondent-Bank to the waiver and delay condonation applications. As last opportunity, let the respondent-Bank file reply by the next date, failing which right of the Bank to file reply shall stand closed as the appeal is of year 2017.
List this case on 31.07.2023 for reply.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Ex-parte
Respondent-Bank
Respondent No. 3
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
