A brief order where the Tribunal orders an auction purchaser granted two weeks to file an objection against the Appellant's application to delete a respondent.
Two weeks' time granted to the auction purchaser (Respondent No. 3) to file an objection to the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Diary No. 635 of 2021)
(Arising out of S.A. No. 98 of 2019 in DRT -1 Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
| 23.03.2023 | Siddhi Vinayk Industries … Appellant -Vs- Central Bank of India & Ors ….Respondents |
|---|---|
| Mr. Debasish Chakrabarty, Learned Counsel Ms. Sarmistha |
|
| Pal, Learned Counsel for the | |
| Appellant | |
| Mr. S.K. Senapati, Learned | |
| Counsel for the Respondent No. | |
| 1. Mr. P.K. Mukherjee, Learned |
|
| Counsel for the Respondent No. 3. |
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
It appears that Central Bank of India was not a party in the SARFAESI Application. Appellant to delete the name of Respondent No. 1 from the array of parties.
I.A. No.130 of 2023 Application u/s 5 of the Limitation Act filed by the Appellant. Learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 3 auction purchaser prays for and is allowed two week’s time to file the objection with copy to the Appellant.
List on 6th July, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated 23rd March, 2023 2/tp
2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Siddhi Vinayk Industries
Central Bank of India & Ors
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
