Mamta Yadav v. Kush Kumar Verma and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The record is an adjournment order listing the case for hearing on a future date; no legal propositions or disposition were recorded.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 138/2017 Date: 13.04.2023
Mamta Yadav Vs. Kush Kumar Verma and Ors.
Present: Shri Rakesh Mishra, counsel for the appellantAuction Purchaser, Shri S. K. Gupta, counsel for the respondent-Borrower, Shri V. K. Shukla, Advocate holding brief of Shri Sandeep Arora, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
A mention has been made by Shri V. K. Shukla that the arguing counsel Shri Sandeep Arora is busy before the Hon’ble High Court, therefore, he prays for adjournment.
List this case for hearing on 10.07.2023.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mamta Yadav
- respondent
Kush Kumar Verma
- respondent
Evidence Bank Limited
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court