In an interim application before the DRAT, the court allowed the respondent's out-of-time reply upon payment of costs, noting para 32 of the rules regarding filing extensions.
Allowed the application to receive the reply out of time on payment of cost.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 395/2023
In
Appeal No. 153/2011
Between
IFCI Ltd.
V/s.
Sun Polytron Industries Ltd. & Ors.
…Respondent/s
Mr. Vinay Deshpande, i/b M/s. V. Deshpande, Advocate for Appellant.
An Advocate for the Respondents is present.
I.A. No. 395/2023 is an application filed by Respondent No.1
and 2 to receive the reply filed out of time.
The application is allowed and the reply shall be received on payment of cost ₹ 2000/- to the D.R.T., Bar Association, Mumbai for the purchase of books and periodicals, within a week.
Post on 30.06.2023 before the Registrar for reporting compliance.
psa-32
1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
IFCI Ltd.
Sun Polytron Industries Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
