Jones and others appealed to the DRT at Mumbai. The court dismissed the appeal and miscellaneous applications due to default by the appellant for failing to correct registry defects and prosecute the matter.
The appeal and miscellaneous applications were dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 186/2023 (CoD)
Appeal on Diary No. 21/2023
Between
R.C. Ganesan & Ors. … Appellant/s V/s. Authorized Officer, …Respondent/s Allahabad Bank & Anr.
Mr. Jayesh Patel, Advocate for Respondent No.3
None appears for the Appellants today. The Appellants were directed to make necessary amendments to the Memorandum of Appeal and also to the application for condonation of delay.
The certain defect which has been pointed out by Registry has also not been carried out by the Appellants.
It seems that the Appellant is not keen on prosecuting the Appeal. Hence, the Appeal along with the application is dismissed for default.
Miscellaneous if are dismissed as Applications, any, infructuous.
Sd/Chairperson
psa-16
1
R.C. Ganesan & Ors.
Authorized Officer
Allahabad Bank & Anr.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
