Order adjourning the appeal No. 137/2002 to be heard in part and listing for continuation of arguments on 28.02.2023.
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai, has not adjudicated the merits of the appeal and simply proceeded to hear the matter in part. The order directs that the arguments be continued on 28.02.2023 due to the hearing not being complete. No substantive legal proposition or disposition is recorded in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 137/2002
Between
The Bank of Tokyo- Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd. … Appellant/s V/s.
Klen & Marshalls Manufacturing & Exports Ltd. …Respondent/s & Anr.
Mr Gaurang Kinkhabwala along with Mr Arun & Ms Priyanka M. & Mr K. Gandhi, i/b C. Amarchand Mangaldas, Advocate for Appellant.
An Advocate for the Respondent is present.
-: Order dated: 07/02/2023:-
Heard in part.
Post on 28.02.2023 for the continuation of arguments.
Sd/Chairperson
psa-28
1
The Bank of Tokyo- Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd.
Klen & Marshalls Manufacturing & Exports Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
