The tribunal allowed substitution of an appellant as the co-defendant had expired. The matter was listed for disposal of the substitution application.
Directions to file an application for substitution of Appellant No. 2 within three weeks and list for disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 122 of 2022
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
25.04.2023 M/s. Ratna Earth Works & Another … Appellants -VsIndian Overseas Bank & Another … Respondents Mr. Nemani Srinivas, Learned Counsel for Appellants
Mr. Shiv Mangal Singh, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 1/Bank
Mr. Sudhir Kumar Senapati, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 2
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Opposition filed by Respondents, taken on record.
It is informed by the Learned Counsel for the Appellant that Appellant No. 2, Mrs. Jeljala Anasuya, expired on 28th March, 2022.
Let substitution application be filed within three weeks with copy to the Respondents.
List on 21st July, 2023 for disposal of substitution application.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated 25th April, 2023 13/ac
M/s. Ratna Earth Works and Another
Indian Overseas Bank
Another
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
