A R Vikram v. State Bank of India
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 116 of 2016
(Arising out of S.A. 166 of 2005 in DRT-I, Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
06.02.2023 A.R. Vikram & Another … Appellants -VsState Bank of India & 6 Others … Respondents Mr. Nemani Srinivas, Learned Counsel for Appellant
Ms. Mekhala Kanji, Learned Counsel for Respondents No. 1 and 2 Mr. Mall Purushotamma Reddy, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 4
Mr. Ariff with Mr. Ratnadip Sarkar and Ms. Kasturi Dasgupta, Learned Counsel for Respondents No. 5 and 6
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
I.A. 293 of 2022
This application is for substitution of the legal representatives of Respondent No. 5 who died pending appeal. Proposed legal representatives No. 5 (a) to 5 (d) are represented through Mr. Ratnadip Sarkar. No objection is filed.
Accordingly, I.A. 293 of 2022 is allowed. Amendment be carried out within a week.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
A.R. Vikram & Another
- respondent
State Bank of India
- respondent
6 Others
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court