The Single Judge Bench heard an appeal regarding anOTS proposal submitted by respondents. The counsel for the bank was asked to seek instructions. The matter was adjourned to 08.05.2023 for hearing on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 110/2015 Date: 15.02.2023
Union Bank of India Vs. M/s Rajat Steels & Ors.
Present: Shri Avinash Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Shri Sandeep Arora, counsel for the appellant-Bank, Shri Abhishek Tiwari, counsel for the respondent no. 1 to 4 and 7,
Shri Kaushal Kishor, counsel for the respondent-PNB,
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the OTS proposal has already been submitted with the Bank, which is pending consideration, therefore, the matter may be adjourned.
Learned counsel for the appellant-bank may obtain instruction with regard to the submission made by the counsel for the respondents by the next date.
List this case on 08.05.2023 for hearing.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Union Bank of India
M/s Rajat Steels
Respondents 1 to 4 and 7
Respondent-PNB
Justice R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
