In an adjournment order, the Tribunal noted that respondent counsel's absence of the brief reelisted the matter to Kolkata.
Matter listed at Kolkata on 09.08.2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA (CAMP-HYDERABAD) Dy. No.524 of 2022
(Arising out of SA No.92 of 2022in DRT-I, Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
27.06.2023
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.… Appellant
-Vs-
M/s Amrit Enterprises & Others
….Respondents
Mr. Swetha Gandhi Ld. Counsel for the Appellant
Mr. P.S.N. Ravindra Ld. Counsel for the Respondents
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL:
When the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the respondent submits that he has not received the brief from his counterpart who is stationed at Kolkata, hence the matter may be adjourned.
Though it cannot be a ground for adjournment, since the request is made on the personal grounds of the learned counsel, list the matter at Kolkata on 09.08.2023.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated 27th June, 2023
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.
M/s Amrit Enterprises & Others
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
