Vardhan H Jaiswal v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as not maintainable due to the appellant's failure to make the required pre-deposit as per a prior order dated 17.01.2023.
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as not maintainable due to the appellant's failure to make the required pre-deposit as per a prior order dated 17.01.2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appl. Dy No. 572 of 2022
(Arising out of SA 58 of 2021 – DRT Guwahati)
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON
12.07.2023
Arijit Saikia & Anr. … Appellants
Vs.
AO, Punjab National Bank & Anr. ….. Respondent
For Appellant : Mr. Nipendra Nath Bain , ld. Senior Counsel. For Respondent : Ms. Aparijita Rao, ld. Counsel Ms. Ankana Basu, ld counsel.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Compliance of the order dated 17.01.2023 passed by this Tribunal regarding pre-deposit is not made.
Accordingly, appeal stands dismissed being not maintainable for want of pre-deposit. No order as to costs.
File be consigned to record room.
Copy of the order be supplied to the appellant and the respondents and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT. Copy of the judgement/Final Order be uploaded in the Tribunal’s website.
Order dictated, signed and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 12th day of July, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava, J) Chairperson
Dated : 12.07.2023 03 /pkb
Arijit Saikia & Anr.
AO, Punjab National Bank & Anr.
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court