Rajeev Goel and Anr. v. Uco Bank and Anr.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 287/2019 Date: 18.01.2023
Rajeev Goel and Anr. Vs. UCO Bank and Anr.
Present: Shri Shekhar Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Shri Mayank Srivastava, counsel for the appellants, Shri Yashwant Singh, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
The office report dated 17.01.2023 shows that notice sent to the respondent no. 2 has returned back with endorsement “left” and no affidavit of service has been filed with regard to the service of notice upon the other respondents and even the counsel for the respondent-Bank has not filed his vakalatnama.
Learned counsel for the appellant is directed to take fresh steps within 10 days for service of notice upon the respondent no. 2 through publication in the newspapers having wide circulation in the area. Affidavit of service along with proof of publication be filed by the next date.
Learned counsel for the respondent-bank may file reply by the next date.
List this case on 17.04.2023 for service.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Rajeev Goel and Anr.
- respondent
UCO Bank and Anr.
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · January
- CNR
- 091090002872019
- Bench
- Rajesh Dayal Khare
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court