Nainital Bank v. M/ S Chitra Chaurasiya
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 1190/2022 Date: 17.01.2023
Nainital Bank Vs. M/s Chitra Chaurasiya
Present: Shri Rahul Mishra, Advocate holding brief of Shri Rakesh Mishra, counsel for the appellant,
Shri Sahil Srivastava, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent-Auction Purchaser and submitted that copy of memo of appeal has not been served. Learned counsel for the appellant undertakes to serve the same upon the counsel for the respondent-Auction Purchaser within 48 hours, who may file reply to the delay condonation application filed by the appellant by the next date.
List this case on 05.04.2023 for reply.
Anupam
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Nainital Bank
- respondent
M/s Chitra Chaurasiya
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · January
- CNR
- 091090011902022
- Bench
- Rajesh Dayal Khare
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court