N Radhakrishnan v. Union Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellate court refused the appellant's request for an extension. Consequently, the waiver application and the underlying appeal were dismissed/rejected for non-prosecution.
What did the court decide?
The request for further time was refused. The waiver application was dismissed and the main appeal was rejected for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 6th Day of June, 2023
PRESENT: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.RAVI KUMAR
CHAIRPERSON
IA 356/2022 (Waiver)
In
AIR (SA) 256/2022
(SA 181/2019 on the file of DRT-I, Ernakulam)
Between
N. Radhakrishnan S/o K.V. Narayanapilla, Kavissery House, Imurikara, Imuri P.O., Perumbavoor, Ernalulam District, Kerala State, Pin 683 544.
…Appellant
And
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant further time for arguments when the matter is listed for dismissal.
Whether to dispose of the waiver application due to non-appearance.
Whether to maintain the dismissal of the underlying appeal due to non-appearance.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
N. Radhakrishnan
- respondent
Authorised Officer, Union Bank of India
- respondent
M. Mohanan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · June
- CNR
- 331090002562022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court