N Radhakrishnan v. Union Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The tribunal posted the matter for dismissal due to lack of representation for the appellant and failure to file proof of service for R2. No substantive decision was rendered in this order.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
IA 356/2022 In A.IR:256/2022
N.Radhakrishnan V/S A.O.,Union Bank Of India & Anr
06/03/2023
No representation of petitioner/appellant. Proof of service for R2 not filed. Counter of R1 is already filed.
Post the matter on 6.6.2023 for dismissal.
Sd/Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
N. Radhakrishnan
- respondent
A.O., Union Bank of India
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · March
- CNR
- 331090002562022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court