N Radhakrishnan v. Union Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Tribunal dismissed the intra-applicatioin for non-prosecution, which consequently led to the rejection of the pending appeal.
What did the court decide?
Intra-applicatioin rejected; Appeal rejected.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
IA 356/2022 in A.IR:256/2022
N.Radhakrishnan V/S A.O.,Union Bank Of India & Anr
06/06/2023
Ld. Counsel for R1 bank reported ready.
Advocate representing petitioner/appellant sought further time for arguments despite the matter is posted today under the caption of ‘dismissal’. Request for further time is refused.
In view of the same, IA 356/2022 (waiver) is dismissed for non prosecution and consequently Appeal AIR 256/2022 is rejected.
Sd/Chairperson
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeal should be allowed given the non-prosecution of the intra-applicatioin.
Whether the appeal pending inside an IRA appellate petition can survive inactive status of IA.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
N. Radhakrishnan
- respondent
A.O., Union Bank Of India
Coram
Chairperson
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court