Premlata Khakaria and Ors. v. Icici Bank Ltd. and Anr.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary No. 121 of 2022
(Arising out of S.A. 33 of 2017 in DRT-III, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
13.04.2023 Premlata Kharkia & 2 Others … Appellants -Vs-
ICICI Bank Limited ... Respondent
None for the Appellants
Ms. Ishita Ghosh representing Mr. Avishek Guha, Learned Counsel for Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
The matter is taken up in the revised list. None appears to represent the Appellants while Learned Counsel for the Respondent is present.
As per the order dated 13th March, 2023, Appellants were required to make pre-deposit which has not been made. Thus, the appeal is not maintainable for want of pre-deposit.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Premlata Kharkia & 2 Others
- respondent
ICICI Bank Limited
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · April
- CNR
- 191090001212022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court