Anil Kumar Gupta v. Union Bank of India
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Misc. Appl Dy. No. 209 of 2023 in Appeal No. 26 of 2021) (Arising out of Appeal No. 04 of 2018 in DRT -3 Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
| 12.04.2023 | Anil Kumar Gupta … Appellant -Vs- Union Bank of India & ors ….Respondents |
|---|---|
| Mr. A.K. Dhandhania, Learned |
|
| Senior Counsel Mr. D. Basu Roy, | |
| Ms. S. Podder, Ms. S. Basu, Ms. | |
| Debdatta Chakraborty, Learned | |
| Counsel for the Appellant | |
| Mr. P. Pal, Learned Counsel for | |
| the Respondent No. 1 | |
| Mr. S. Pal Chowdhury, Learned | |
| Counsel for Respondent No. 2 |
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Admission
At the very outset Learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 2 raised the plea of maintainability of the Review application.
Appellant should serve the copy upon the Respondents. Notices be issued to other Respondents. Opposition may be filed within four weeks with copy to the Appellant who may file rejoinder within two weeks thereafter. Affidavit of service be filed within two weeks.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Anil Kumar Gupta
- respondent
Union Bank of India & ors
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court