Hinduja Leyland Finance Limited v. kesharchand lalchand navlakha
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Contd Sheet
| \ Date | Office Notes, Appearances and Registrar’s order / Chairperson’s |
Orders |
|---|---|---|
| 20/03 12003 | (None, bo4h Parries ’Per^ox/aJ H> |
1^/ 1) /2.0 2a- |
| “LTI <■ P-eg ts+srmr* | ||
| 13-1 MO Z3 | Due to administrative reason, | |
| board discharged.04 -ol - 26 24 |
i'
(
FARAD
DEBTS RECOVERYAPPELLATE tribunal. MUMRAI
Mlsc Application No. ------ —of 20
In I. No.
Appeal No. Ll *5^0120^3.
A Tvvmxvu^ Z<rp ; ... Appellants
(Advocate^M^ ■ C^. Tod ko-l_
J
Versus
-Rwpon**»
(Advocate.
)
Date Office Notes, Appearances
and Registrar's order / Chairperson’s Orders
Appeal presented by rtA3>, ^ToJCkuTL .
* h
Advocate for Appellant with (XD. / IPO of Rs. on
being aggrieved by (he impugned order / fi,
order
passed on —k
in S.A. /J>ArNo.^g2 of
by DRT,- u/s R,D.D.B.& F I Aet-TO93 / 18 of
S.A.R.F.A.E^S.I. Act. 2002.
Exh - 1 Appeal Memo
i ///M
S.O. for compliance to
EGISTRAR
1 /^/QZQ3 ftrzT bo+^ pQTT H <5
C2o/a3/2(r:t3
Coro pl 1I GlA C e.
rMj •
P.T.O.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · November
- CNR
- 271090011562023
- Bench
- Nishad Fazil F
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court