Pankaj Dubey v. Union Bank of India and 2 Ors.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 96/2023 Date: 08.05.2023
Present: Shri Shantanu Pandey, counsel for the appellant, Shri Sandeep Arora, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
The office report dated 03.05.2023 shows that the notices sent to the respondent nos. 2 & 3 have returned back with endorsement “the addressees do not reside at the given address”.
Let the appellant take fresh steps within 10 days for service of notice upon the unserved respondents by publication in the newspaper having wide circulation in the area. Affidavit of service along with proof of publication be filed by the next date.
Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank seeks time to file reply. Let the same be filed by the next date.
List this case on 18.08.2023 for service.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
the appellant
- respondent
the respondent-Bank
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · May
- CNR
- 091090000962023
- Bench
- Rajesh Dayal Khare
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court