Y Narasimha Raju v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
In This miscellaneous appeal, the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Kolkata condoned a three-day delay in filing I.A. 392 of 2023 under Section 5 of the Limitation Act and listed the main appeal for hearing.
What did the court decide?
Interim application I.A. 392 of 2023 for condonation of delay is allowed; main appeal listed for hearing.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Misc. Appeal Dy. No. 670 of 2023
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON
24.11.2023
Sri Yenugudhati Narasimha Raju
… Appellant Vs.
Canara Bank Ltd. & Ors.
Respondents
For Appellant : Mr. Nemani Srinivas, ld. Advocate.
For Respondents : Ms. Aparajita Rao, ld advocate.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Vakalatnama filed by the learned counsel for the respondents is taken on record.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the condonation of delay of three days under Section 5 of the Limitation Act is entitled to be allowed in I.A. 392 of 2023.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Yenugudhati Narasimha Raju
- respondent
Canara Bank Ltd. & Ors.
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · November
- CNR
- 191090006702023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court