Gada Uma Lavanya v. Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal as not maintainable because compliance with an order dated 5th September 2023 regarding pre-deposit was not made.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed for want of pre-deposit.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary No. 138 of 2023
(Arising out of S.A. 138 of 2019 in DRT-I. Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
24.11.2023 Mrs. Gada Uma Lavanya . .. Appellant -VsBank of India & 2 Others ... Respondents
Mr. Nemani Srinivas, Learned Counsel for the Appellants
Mr. Debasish Chakrabarti with Ms. Sharmistha Pal, Learned Counsel for Respondent Bank
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Compliance of order dated 5th September, 2023 regarding predeposit is not made. Thus, the appeal is not maintainable for want of pre-deposit.
Accordingly, the instant appeal, being Diary No. 138 of 2023, is dismissed being not maintainable.
Copy of the order be supplied to Appellant and the Respondents and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mrs. Gada Uma Lavanya
- respondent
Bank of India & 2 Others
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court